By industry
Google review removal for aesthetic clinics
Cosmetic clinics attract a specific kind of review: emotional, personal and often not from a patient at all.
Aesthetic work provokes strong views, and clinics are also a target for people with no treatment history at all: ex-partners, rival practitioners and accounts created for a single post.
Because results are subjective, the argument almost never turns on whether the patient was happy. It turns on policy.
Send us the review and get an honest answer.
From £99 a removal, priced per review. No charge for the eligibility check.
- Honest check before you pay
- Most cases decided in 24 to 72 hours
- Full refund if Google keeps it up
Common patterns on clinic profiles
Aesthetic clinics have a distinctive review profile, and these are the cases we assess most often.
- Reviews naming a practitioner or therapist personally, including before-and-after allegations
- Complaints from people with no consent form, no consultation record and no appointment
- A negative run appearing right after a competitor opens nearby or after a price change
- Reviews that describe a treatment the clinic does not offer or has never advertised
Where the policy argument sits
Subjectivity cuts both ways: Google protects opinion, but several of the patterns above breach clear rules.
- Harassment and personal information, where a named individual is targeted
- Conflict of interest, where the reviewer is a rival practitioner or a former employee
- Spam and fake engagement, where accounts are new, duplicated or posting in concert
Evidence a clinic can supply
Consultation and consent records settle the question of whether someone was ever a patient.
- A search of booking and consent records for the name or telephone number
- Staff schedules showing the named practitioner did not work on the date described
- Screenshots of the same review text appearing on another clinic's profile
Questions we get asked
No. Dissatisfaction is opinion. The case has to rest on a policy breach, such as harassment, a named individual, fake engagement or content that is not about a real treatment.
Sometimes. Where the accusation is a factual claim that your records disprove, or it identifies a clinician personally, there is a policy argument. Send us the wording and dates and we will assess it honestly.
Yes, and this is common in aesthetics. Reviews written by a partner or relative about a treatment they did not receive usually fall outside a real experience, which is a policy question.
Related pages
Tell us about the review
Send the review or your Google Maps link on WhatsApp. We will tell you whether it breaks Google's rules, what a removal costs, and whether it is worth filing at all. The decision is always Google's, and the eligibility check is free.
Or browse all removal services.